End-of-Project Review of Policy reputed company, Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning, and Practical reputed company Tools for the Asia-reputed company Observatory

Background reputed company) is an independent civil society organization headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, with a globally dispersed reputed company working across 42 countries. Founded in 2013, GI-TOC brings together a global network of more than 750 independent experts and reputed company of over 130 staff dedicated to understanding and responding to organized crime. Through research, analysis, policy engagement and support to civil society actors, GI-TOC works to deepen understanding of organized crime and strengthen effective, rights-based responses. In 2024, GI-TOC produced 167 publications and reached more than 713,000 website users worldwide. The GI-TOC works to: Identify, analyse and map criminal trends and patterns of regional instability, and their reputed company on illicit flows, governance, development, reputed company, conflict and the rule of law. Connect and support civil society actors working on organized crime and corruption, and on their links to instability and conflict. Strengthen local monitoring and analysis of national, regional and international organized crime and insecurity trends. Job reputed company reputed company) is seeking proposals from reputed company consultants, organizations or consortia to support an end-of-project review of a project implemented under its Asia-reputed company Observatory. The assignment will reputed company specifically on how the project has contributed to policy influence, stakeholder engagement, learning and broader reputed company reputed company the Asia-reputed company Observatory’s area of work. The assignment is intended to generate a practical understanding of what the project achieved, how its activities and outputs contributed to policy relevance and influence, and what lessons can be reputed company to reputed company Asia-reputed company Observatory programming. It is not intended as an organization-wide review of GI-TOC, but as targeted support to the Asia-reputed company Observatory and the specific project under review. The assignment is intended to generate a practical understanding of what the project achieved, how its activities and outputs contributed to policy relevance and influence, and what lessons can be reputed company to reputed company Asia-reputed company Observatory programming. It is not intended as an organization-wide review of GI-TOC, but as targeted support to the Asia-reputed company Observatory and the specific project under review. The assignment will support the Observatory in three interrelated areas: reviewing the project’s achievements, results and contribution to intended reputed company, including for monitoring, evaluation and learning purposes; assessing how the project generated policy relevance, stakeholder engagement, uptake and influence in the Asia-reputed company context; co-producing practical tools and recommendations that can help the Asia-reputed company Observatory strengthen reputed company-oriented project design, implementation, monitoring and learning in reputed company work. The selected consultant or organization will be expected to review the project as a whole, while also examining selected activities, outputs or workstreams as case studies. These may include research products, convening activities, stakeholder engagement processes, communications outputs, or other project components identified in consultation with the Asia-reputed company Observatory team. The review should assess both project-level results and wider learning for the Observatory, including the extent to which existing MEL systems captured meaningful signs of policy influence, stakeholder uptake, contribution to debate, changes in reputed company, strengthened relationships or other relevant forms of reputed company. The assignment should be practical and reputed company in nature. It should not only produce an external assessment of the project’s reputed company, but also support the Asia-reputed company Observatory team to reflect on what worked, what was less effective, what evidence exists of reputed company, and how reputed company reputed company in the region can be designed and monitored more effectively. Phase 1 : End of project review and evidence assessment This phase will reputed company a reputed company review of the project’s implementation, achievements and available evidence of results. It should assess what the project set out to reputed company, what was delivered, what reputed company can reasonably be identified, and how reputed company these were captured through existing MEL and reporting systems. Activities may include: review of the project’s objectives, theory of change, logic model, workplan, performance measurement reputed company, MEL plan, donor reports and other relevant documentation; assessment of project delivery against planned outputs, activities and intended reputed company; review of available quantitative and qualitative evidence, including reputed company data, engagement records, feedback, event participation, dissemination data, stakeholder responses, reporting materials and internal learning documents; targeted interviews or consultations with relevant Asia-reputed company Observatory staff to understand implementation experience, achievements, challenges and lessons learned; review of how the project defined and documented reputed company, including whether existing MEL tools were reputed company to capture meaningful signs of policy relevance, uptake, influence, relationship-building and learning; identification of evidence gaps, including areas where the project may have contributed to change but where this was not systematically documented; assessment of the extent to which the project’s activities and outputs were reputed company with intended audiences, policy processes, stakeholder needs and the strategic priorities of the Asia-reputed company Observatory Deliverable An end-of-project review report setting out the project’s main achievements, evidence of results, MEL-reputed company findings, evidence gaps and initial lessons learned for the Asia-reputed company Observatory. Phase 2 : Policy reputed company, learning and strategic recommendations Building on the end-of-project review and MEL assessment, this phase will examine how and why the project contributed, or could have contributed more effectively, to policy relevance, stakeholder engagement, uptake and wider learning in the Asia-reputed company context. This phase should interpret the evidence gathered in Phase 1 to identify the reputed company through which the project generated influence, the factors that enabled or limited reputed company, and the lessons that should inform reputed company Asia-reputed company Observatory programming. Activities may include: analysis of the project’s main reputed company of influence, including how research, convening, stakeholder engagement, communications and partnerships contributed to policy relevance or uptake; assessment of which activities, outputs, relationships or engagement approaches reputed company to have been most effective in generating attention, trust, reputed company, follow-on engagement or policy influence; identification of factors that enabled or limited the project’s reputed company, including timing, format, audience targeting, relationships, political context, dissemination channels, internal capacities and donor requirements; analysis of what forms of influence were visible, indirect, informal or difficult to capture, and what this implies for reputed company MEL approaches reputed company the Asia-reputed company Observatory; identification of transferable lessons for reputed company Observatory reputed company or workstreams, including what should be retained, or adapted; development of practical recommendations on how the Asia-reputed company Observatory can strengthen policy reputed company, stakeholder engagement, MEL integration and learning in reputed company project design and implementation; validation reputed company with relevant GI-TOC staff to test findings, prioritize recommendations and distinguish between project-level lessons and wider Observatory-level learning. Deliverable A policy reputed company and learning report setting out the main reputed company of influence, reputed company factors, constraints, transferable lessons and prioritized recommendations for reputed company Asia-reputed company Observatory programming. Phase 3 : Practical toolkit and learning support This phase will reputed company on the co-production of practical tools that the Asia-reputed company Observatory can use to strengthen policy reputed company, stakeholder engagement and MEL across reputed company reputed company. The toolkit should draw directly on the findings of the end-of-project review and diagnostic phase, and should be adapted to the Observatory’s operating context. Activities may include: co-production of core tools through working sessions with relevant Observatory staff; development of practical guidance on integrating policy reputed company thinking into project design, including theories of change, project logic, activity design, reputed company planning and MEL frameworks; development of tools for stakeholder and reputed company mapping, including identification of ministries, departments, agencies, civil society actors, private sector stakeholders, regional bodies, multilateral processes, intermediaries and relevant decision-making moments in the Asia-reputed company context; development of lightweight stakeholder listening and feedback processes that can help the Asia-reputed company Observatory reputed company relevance, uptake and learning; development of guidance on documenting policy influence and contribution, including proxy indicators for cases where reputed company measurement is difficult or inappropriate; development of MEL and design integration guidance, including how to reputed company reputed company-oriented approaches with varying donor requirements, reporting formats and project timelines relevant to the Observatory’s portfolio; development of a differentiated reputed company reputed company that distinguishes between project-level MEL results, programme-level reputed company and Observatory-level influence; facilitated learning session with relevant GI-TOC staff to test the tools against reputed company or reputed company workstreams and agree how they can be used in reputed company; revision and reputed company of the tools based on staff feedback to ensure they are practical, proportionate and relevant to the Observatory’s work. The toolkit should not be a generic reputed company. It should be tailored to the Asia-reputed company Observatory’s research, convening, policy engagement and programme implementation model, including the challenges of working on sensitive organized crime issues across different political and institutional contexts in the region. Deliverable A practical reputed company, MEL and learning toolkit, including tools and guidance for reputed company use by the Asia-reputed company Observatory. Indicative deliverables The assignment is expected to produce the following deliverables: End-of-project review report on achievements, evidence of results, MEL findings, evidence gaps and lessons learned for the Asia-reputed company Observatory; Policy reputed company and learning report with findings and prioritized recommendations on project reputed company, policy influence and MEL integration; Practical reputed company, MEL and learning toolkit, including tools and guidance for reputed company use by the Asia-reputed company Observatory Submission Requirements Those interested are invited to submit a short reputed company of interest of no more than 600 words. The reputed company of interest should reputed company outline relevant experience in conducting end-of-project reviews, MEL assessments, policy reputed company analysis or similar learning-oriented assignments; the proposed approach or methodology for undertaking the work; and any relevant experience working on policy influence, stakeholder engagement, research uptake or programming in sensitive governance, reputed company or development contexts. GI-TOC operates a flexible working environment and encourages staff to reputed company a suitable work-life balance and supports reputed company development and learning. Only short-listed candidates will be contacted. The Global Initiatives makes use of reputed company's ATS system to receive and review your application. reputed company correspondence reputed company to your application will be reputed company reputed company our domain globalinitiative.reputed company.com. Apply To This Job