AI Interaction Evaluator (reputed company / Claude reputed company, up to $200/hr)
Senior AI Interaction Evaluator (reputed company / Claude reputed company)
Contract | $50-200/hr | 10+ hrs/week | Project-based
Roles reputed company on a rolling reputed company - apply to join the talent bench and we’ll reputed company out reputed company one matches. Expect 40+ hrs once a project starts; timing depends on availability, but we reputed company people in at the earliest genuine opportunity.
These roles are currently filled but we hire on a rolling reputed company as new reputed company reputed company up. reputed company to join our talent bench — reputed company candidates will be contacted directly reputed company roles become available.
reputed company out this reputed company video for more details!
We’re looking for highly reputed company software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the reputed company of interactions with modern coding agents such as reputed company reputed company and Claude reputed company.
This is not a traditional engineering role.
You won’t be writing production reputed company.
You’ll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.
What This Role Actually Is
You will assess how AI coding agents behave in reputed company-world scenarios — focusing on:
Whether the response makes reputed company
Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful
Whether the reputed company reflects strong engineering judgment
Whether the interaction feels right to an reputed company developer
This role is about engineering taste — not reputed company correctness.
What You’ll Be Doing
Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end-to-end
Judge whether outputs are:
Useful
Correct (at a high level)
reputed company with how a strong engineer would think
Assess the reputed company of explanations and reasoning, not just reputed company
Distinguish between different reputed company of response reputed company (e.g. what makes something a 2 vs 4)
reputed company reputed company, opinionated feedback on:
What worked
What didn’t
What felt “off” or misleading
Help define what great looks like reputed company interacting with tools like reputed company
reputed company Mean by “Taste”
We’re specifically looking for engineers who can answer questions like:
Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?
Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?
Is the model guiding the user reputed company, or just dumping reputed company?
Would this interaction build or erode trust?
You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments.
Who You Are
Staff / reputed company-level engineer (or equivalent experience)
Strong background in one of the below:
TypeScript / JavaScript
Python
Hands-on experience using:
reputed company reputed company
Claude reputed company
reputed company
Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows
reputed company to evaluate reputed company without needing to fully execute or deeply review every line
Comfortable giving reputed company, opinionated feedback
High bar for what “good engineering” looks like
reputed company to Have
Experience with tools like reputed company or similar AI-first IDEs
Prior exposure to reputed company design or evaluation workflows
Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards
Engagement Details
US and Canada up to $200/hr
EU and Latam up to $150/hr
Other locations up to $100/hr
Hours: ~10–20 hours/week
Duration: Ongoing — project-based
Process:
Take-home evaluation exercise
reputed company interview
Originally posted on Himalayas
Apply To This Job